Fun with Charlie.

From Charlie's post on 'The Minors'

Not surprisingly, I want one.

Shooting at Critters

Why kill Prairie Dogs?

Plague, Tularemia, and Monkeypox:
It is worth noting that theses are diseases that the Center for Disease Control, in Atlanta has stated are transferred to humans; Okay, mostly by people shooting and skinning the prairie dogs or by keeping them as pets... It's the fleas that the prairie dog carries that actually transmit the disease.


Habitat sharing with cattle... a commercial concern:
For the following reason, the grass in and around prairie dog colonies is lusher and sweeter; cattle and bison prefer the taste and can 'bulk-up' on the grazing-land not occupied by the colonies.

Prairie dogs control sagebrush, mesquite, prickly pear, and other weeds noxious to native ungulates and livestock. For example, studies show that prairie dogs consume mesquite, an invader which degrades the economic value of rangeland and makes round-ups difficult. Prairie dogs also eat grasshoppers which benefits agriculture.

Prairie Dogs are so darned cute.:
The more cute things men shoot, the closer our wives and children will be drawn to our dogs in their absence.

Marksmanship:
Nothing trains our young shooters for the skills requisite to becoming a military sniper like long-range, small, active targets. Well, nothing both legally and morally defensible...

Male Bonding and home-habitat-destruction:
C'mon, gals; would you rather we sat on the couch in tighty-whities and drank beer while watching football?

Defense From Frontal Assault Part 1

You are out in public, minding your own business; suddenly you find your way obstructed by a man who extends his arm and grasps your shirt by the shoulder or neck. As a 'Man' his father should have taught him better. As a man; it now falls to you to conduct an 'On The Spot Correction'

It is wholly appropriate to remind him that his behavior is inappropriate; something calm and polite like this: "That's not very nice, please remove your hand."

He now has all the information he should need to adjust his own behavior. He will 1. Remove his hand, straighten your clothing and ask forgiveness for his gaffe, or 2. Escalate the confrontation, giving you legal recourse to continue with the corrective action.

Step One: Presuming that it is his right hand on you, reach over his hand with your left hand, grasping around the top of his hand with your fingers and placing your thumb just between his thumb and the break of his wrist. Squeeze his hand between your thumb and fingers as you twist his thumb down in a counter-clockwise motion. This must be done as quickly as you are comfortable moving. As his arm bends at the elbow, smash your right forearm into the break of his elbow, driving his captured wrist toward a spot roughly six inches out from his shoulder.

You have now begun to move his balance point over and away from his center of gravity as your right forearm moves deep into the break of his elbow. The momentum of this move will cause you both to fall; him onto the ground and you onto him. If you can visualize this, since there is no safe way to practice it, you will realize that one more piece is desirable to fully protect yourself; as you began to push his arm over, shift your weight to your left leg and step behind his right leg, wrapping your leg around his.

As you both fall, the weight of your body will cause the following musculo-skeletal injuries:

1. Sprained or broken wrist
2. Hyper-extended or dislocated elbow
3. Hyper-extended or dislocated knee
3. Concussion to his brain

The entire encounter should only last about 10 seconds. Your fall will be broken as his body absorbs the energy and you will likely not even get dirty unless you remain to render assistance and have to kneel on the ground to review his lapse in manners.

Is The Inside Cream Filling, or Grit?

The other day, the conversation turned to 'The character of men v. Man's portrayed character; that is to say is the person reflected in the character they portray on the screen and in public This picture reminds me of Charles Bronson's character in 'Hard Times' but I really only hope that Bronson was the stand-up-hard-guy he played in movies; I don't want to know if he wasn't because part of my socialisation, as a boy was based upon such ideals as the gun-fighter in 'The Magnificent Seven', the melon farmer in 'Mr. Majestyk', the sleeper agent in 'Telefon', the fugitive from injustice in 'Death Hunt', the prisoner of conscience who survives in 'The Dirty Dozen' and the indignant father in 'Death Wish'. There are a great many iconic man-figures in literature who represent our best at their worst; in 'Orthodoxy' G.K. Chesterton described the hero of a story in classic literature as "a sane man set in an insane world.." and in modern literature the hero, he perceived as being "an insane man in a sane world.."

The oldest surviving fictional text is 'Beowulf', a tale now being treated by the film industry. In the tale, Beowulf is the hero whose community is beset by a monster named 'Grendl', whom Beowulf overcomes in battle. The original intent of this story was not to reflect an inner struggle in the heart of man with his evil deprecatious nature, but instead was purported to be anecdotal. Beowulf was, in every noble set, a man we would want around when we're wrongly accused of cheating at cards by a bitter cowpoke with a pistol. Yes, I'm talking about Robert Redford's character, 'The Sundance Kid'. Redford likes to play the 'anti-hero', the bad guy who has his flaws but does good things anyway or bad things that can be rationalised. I like 'Jeremiah Johnson' as one of the top films of all time but I am not in the circle of people who would want to sit down with Redford for coffee or beers.

Too many heroic characters being played by real-life scoundrels. When we see someone we like on the big screen, do we transfer our admiration for their character to the actor? If so, we have to step back a pace or two and consider how much we allow this person to influence our public behavior and the way that this characterises us, as Christ followers. You, as a man, could scarcely go wrong with the model of Jimmy Stewart; a Brigadier General in the US Army Air Corps because he let his hiney hang out in B-17 missions over Germany. John Wayne was a dust-up cowboy actor who wanted to fight in WWII but John Ford would convince him that he could accomplish more for America by setting examples for boys and young men instead. John Wayne did what most in his place should do; he supported the military to the extent that he could. In the US Army JFK Special Warfare Museum on Ft Bragg, NC is a check that he wrote to establish the museum and a letter to the soldiers and officers of the US Special Forces that expresses his admiration.

Yeah, well. So I was thinking; our sons will see what we do. They will see what we don't do. Most important is the idea that we ought not allow these little guys to be presented someone elses' concepts of virtue vis-a-vis manliness and all it's facets; Yoda is not Jesus Christ and dad asking his son to hand him wrenches while he fixes the sink will soon find that a wrench is more influential to his son than a lightsaber. Yep. In closing, one final thought; those things that we do, as men that we think our sons do not see us doing are played out in our character every day. The way that he interprets what a man should be has everything to do with how his dad shows him it's done.

And So In No Particular Order The Man Code

The Man Code. Chapter IV. Explosives and Men

Part A--General Provisions

§. 1. From the first time a man farted too near a fire, explosions have dominated a persistent 11% of all man-brain function. Aging has a demonstrated inverse causational effect upon this fascination as ever increased complexity, brightness, concussion and duration are required to stimulate the genetically alloted capacity of man's cerebral cortex. This is in measured contrast to the tested .003% of a woman's brain¹, committed to demolitions.

Part B--Demolitions Related Periphery

§. 1. Cannon Fuze, Det(onation) Cord, Blasting Caps;
§§. 1. Actions Upon Encountering Demolitions Materiel

c.1. Any man happening upon one or more of these items in it's functional state is under the compunction to remove himself from the immediate vicinity to any safe distance² until such time as he and/or his 'Buds' can determine whether he might safely remove and store the items in his Truck³, Garage⁴, Shed⁵ or Tackle Box⁶.

c.2. He must never knowingly allow his Wife⁷ to become aware of his possession of these articles until he can safely⁸ deploy them in the course of entertaining his children, Neighborhood Men (see 'Buds') and Dogs with the intent of the invocation of awe.


¹ data is applicable only on the 4th of July; based upon control group study ( accuracy +/- .003%)
² any wood-pile, tree, ditch, station wagon or hillock
³ any 4-wheel drive, personal conveyance capable of transporting dogs, guns, fishing gear, and not more than 1 'Bud' unless designated as 'Crew-cab' or 2-wheel drive designated as 'Pick-up'
⁴ any structure attached or detached to a man's domecile of which the primary function is, or originally was the storage of automobiles or trucks
⁵ any structure annexed to the domecile, not designated as a 'Garage'
⁶ a hand-portable container designed or improvised to carry the necessary hooks, line, jigs, spoons, lures, baits, weights, tools with which to attract and catch those scaly bastards and expired regulations governing said practice
⁷ long-suffering sole designated and lawful partner to a man.
⁸ any amusing antic which does not unintentionally ignite structures and or motor vehicles, meaningfully menace or cause irreparable emotional trauma to children or dogs, immolate landscaping (herein construed to include more than 20% of total lawn) or cause physical damage to self which does not elicit responses of 'Cool', or 'awesome' when examined in normal illumination conditions.

The Man Code

Q: What's 'manly' these days?

A: The same things that have always been 'manly'.

Common Sense, Chivalry, Courage, Integrity, Fair Play, Dependability; these things have always been truths of men and when there is no man there to espouse these things, they will still be true.